Friday, March 13, 2026
Louisville.news

Latest news from Louisville

Story of the Day

Louisville’s defense closes late to eliminate SMU, 62-58, in ACC Tournament second round

AuthorEditorial Team
Published
March 11, 2026/04:43 PM
Section
Sport
Louisville’s defense closes late to eliminate SMU, 62-58, in ACC Tournament second round
Source: Wikimedia Commons / Author: University of Louisville

Low-scoring rematch decided by stops and late execution in Charlotte

CHARLOTTE — Louisville advanced in the ACC Tournament on Wednesday, March 11, 2026, defeating SMU 62-58 in a game that contrasted sharply with the teams’ high-scoring regular-season meetings. The second-round matchup was the third meeting between the programs in less than six weeks, after Louisville won 88-74 on Jan. 31 and SMU answered with a 95-85 win on Feb. 17.

Wednesday’s result turned on defensive possessions and half-court shot-making rather than pace. The teams were tied 26-26 at halftime, and Louisville held SMU to 32 points after intermission. SMU scored 15 points over the final 6:28, but Louisville preserved the lead with rebounds, forced turnovers, and contested perimeter attempts in key sequences.

How the game tightened after halftime

The second half featured repeated lead changes and extended scoreless stretches, with both teams struggling to generate clean looks. SMU’s perimeter scoring threats remained active, but Louisville limited second-chance opportunities and created disruption on the ball to keep SMU from settling into extended rhythm.

Louisville’s defensive work was particularly important against SMU’s primary creators. The Mustangs entered the tournament with guard Boopie Miller as their leading scorer (19.5 points per game) and Jaron Pierre Jr. next (17.6). After SMU’s opening-round win over Syracuse, both Miller and Pierre had made five 3-pointers in that game, making Louisville’s closeouts and ball-screen coverage central to the game plan.

Context: three games, three different styles

The 62-58 finish underscored the variability in outcomes when familiar opponents meet repeatedly in a short window. The first two matchups produced 162 and 180 total points, respectively. In the tournament setting, the game slowed into a possession-by-possession contest, and Louisville’s ability to defend without fouling and finish defensive rebounds became a separating factor late.

  • Halftime: tied 26-26.

  • Final: Louisville 62, SMU 58.

  • Louisville entered as the No. 6 seed; SMU was the No. 11 seed.

What it means going forward

Louisville’s win adds a tournament result built on defensive execution after a regular season in which both teams showed they could score in volume. For SMU, which had entered the ACC Tournament needing results after a late-season slide, the narrow loss ended a run that began with Tuesday’s 86-69 victory over Syracuse.

Scoreline and flow: a tied first half followed by a defensive second half that kept the margin within a single possession down the stretch.